Paul Jubb vs Naoki Tajima Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison

• In recent form, Jubb has a higher second serve point win rate (46.33%) compared to Tajima (38.08%). Could this be a decisive factor in predicting match outcomes?
• Regarding second serve returns, Tajima has a slight edge, winning 46.61% of opponents' points, while Jubb's success is at 45.37%.
• In first serve returns, Jubb outperforms Tajima with a win rate of 28.79% over Tajima's 26.51%.
• Under pressure, Jubb exhibits greater resilience, saving 57.03% of breakpoints, whereas Tajima saves 40.31%.
• Over the past year, Tajima demonstrates a better match win percentage (60.66%) compared to Jubb's 44.68%.
• Tajima's best performances are on Hard courts (52% win rate), while Jubb excels on Clay surfaces (72%).
• Considering tournament levels, Tajima competes primarily in Futures/ITF $10K events with a 63.79% win rate, whereas Jubb participates in higher-level Challengers/ITF tournaments >$10K with a 36.36% success rate.
• The average rank of opponents faced by Jubb (234.38) is slightly higher compared to Tajima's opponents (240.38).
• If the match extends to a deciding set, Tajima has a narrow lead, winning 60% of such sets, compared to Jubb's 55%.
• Tajima demonstrates superior break point conversion in recent play, scoring on 34.29% of opportunities, while Jubb has a success rate of 29.63%.

Editorial Prediction (July 23, 2025, UTC):

Tajima's recent form indicates an overall stronger match win percentage over the last year, outperforming Jubb in converting critical break points and excelling in deciding set scenarios. Despite Jubb's superior performance in handling pressure under breakpoints and a more competitive opponent pool, Tajima's consistent success rate in converting crucial opportunities marks a significant advantage.

Furthermore, Tajima's ability to capitalize on second serve return points, coupled with a higher overall match winning percentage, positions them favorably. However, Jubb's competence on Clay surfaces, although not applicable here, highlights their capacity to challenge and disrupt opponents effectively.

Considering the comprehensive analysis, Tajima appears to hold a slight edge heading into the head-to-head confrontation, potentially securing a victory over Jubb in this matchup.